A shocking fact for 10 million human evolution




Some 10 million years ago, some things like human fossilism are expected to occur in the suburbs of 
Europe studied by anthropologists. What they conclude from a fossilized study is that bi-directional man can have deeper origins than previously thought.
Rudapithecus. This is the name given by the researchers to the wonderful splendor that lived in Europe in the Late Miocene, about 10 million years ago. Today, a study of fossilized remains of a sample of this marker offers scientists a new view of the bi-directional appearance in humans.
It should be noted that anthropologists at the University of Toronto (Canada) on the bones of the limbs, jaws and wounds in Rodabithecus have already shown that it belongs to both the human family Africa. The data in itself is really staggering given where the fossil remains were discovered: in Rodabania, Hungary.
But when researchers at the University of Missouri (USA) discovered and then analyzed a group of rodabithecus, it is rarely preserved in time as they had the greatest trauma.
Modern African burns have a long basin and a narrow lower back. On the other hand, they have a longer, more flexible back that allows them to stand and walk on two legs.
:African man
The Rudapithecus basin in Rudabánya was incomplete, and the researchers relied on three-dimensional modeling procedures to derive its shape and compare it with the modern hot form. "The Rodabithecus basin is very different from the Africans basin," says Carol Ward, a researcher at the University of Missouri.
So, instead of asking why our ancestors gave up all four points for bipedalism, should we ask why our ancestors didn't give up bipedalism to crawl? According to Carol Ward, "For humans to evolve from a burning African body, substantial changes are needed to lengthen the lower back and shorten the pelvis. For humans to evolve from an ancestor closer to Rodabithecus, this change is simpler."
The team now hopes to design other parts of the fossilized rodabithecus body to learn more about how they move. It may support the idea - already suggested by other evidence - that our ancestors may have been built differently from contemporary African Africans.